By late 2025, the global advertising industry crossed a line it had been edging towards for years. Omnicom and the Interpublic Group agreed to merge, creating the largest agency holding company the world has ever seen. While the deal ran into tens of billions of dollars and promised scale, it actually exposed an industry under siege.

The Illusion of the Full-Service Empire

For decades, holding companies sold the idea of the full-service empire. They placed creative, media, PR, digital, and experiential all under one roof. However, while that model once delivered power and profit, it today looks bloated, slow, and out of step. Consequently, the Omnicom–IPG merger was not a victory lap; rather, it was a defensive move for survival.

Behind the language of “synergies” and “integration” sat a harsher truth. Margins are shrinking and clients are becoming increasingly impatient. Furthermore, technology platforms are eating into agency territory at an alarming rate. This merger fast-tracked the retirement of long-standing brands and triggered thousands of job cuts. Ultimately, this represents consolidation driven by necessity, not ambition.

The Rise of Platform Dominance

The new mega-group now controls a massive share of global advertising spend. Nevertheless, its very size highlights the fear driving the deal. Agencies worry they cannot compete with platforms that control media and data unless they bulk up. This fear is justified because technology companies have moved beyond being simple media owners.

Today, Meta, Google, and Amazon offer automated ad creation and buying tools. As a result, brands can launch campaigns without briefing an agency or paying high retainers. What once required specialist teams now runs almost entirely on software. This shift strikes at the heart of the agency value proposition, as scale alone no longer equals relevance in an automated world.

A Harsher Reality for Talent and Mid-Sized Firms

The pain does not stop at the holding-company level. In fact, mid-sized and independent agencies face an even harsher reality. Industry forecasts point to shrinking headcounts and forced reinvention. Because AI continues to replace labor-heavy workflows, Forrester analysts expect further consolidation and sustained job losses.

Client pressure compounds the problem significantly. In 2025, brands cut production budgets by 30 to 50 percent across multiple markets. In addition, big crews disappeared and stock footage became the norm. Even talent has not been spared, as employment in advertising agencies fell faster than in other professional services between 2023 and 2025.

Redefining Relevance in a Changing Economy

This is not a healthy consolidation; instead, it is fragmentation under pressure. At the top, holding companies merge to protect margins. Meanwhile, smaller agencies fight commoditization or vanish entirely. At the edges, a new class of specialist firms is emerging, focused on data, AI, or niche creativity.

The economics of agencies have changed for good. Retainers are fading while performance-based contracts are on the rise. Consequently, agencies no longer act purely as client advocates; they are trying to become platforms and technology partners simultaneously.

Looking Ahead: Growth or Decline?

Large groups will keep cutting to stay profitable. However, the most resilient agencies will not chase size. Instead, they will chase relevance by combining strategy and technology in ways platforms cannot replicate. For brands, the choice is now between large networks for scale or smaller firms for speed.

Consolidation may redraw the agency map, but it does not solve the core problem. In conclusion, bigger agencies do not automatically create better value. Until agencies redefine their unique contribution in a platform-dominated world, consolidation will remain less a strategy for growth and more a slow admission of decline.

ALSO WATCH MARKETING EDGE ONTV