Dr. Ajiborode Abiodun – July 2025

Abstract

Contemporary marketing environments demand sophisticated approaches to brand building that transcend traditional demographic segmentation strategies. This conceptual paper introduces the TSPR model encompassing Tribe, Story, Platform, and Ritual as a strategic framework for cultivating brand sacredness through community-driven engagement. Drawing from multi-year ethnographic research within archetypal consumer communities, this study examines how brands can achieve sacred status by fostering meaningful connections that embed them within consumer identities and routines. The framework challenges conventional demographic-based segmentation by emphasizing shared values, emotional narratives, interactive platforms, and ritualistic practices as foundational elements of enduring brand loyalty. Through systematic integration of these four pillars, brands can transcend functional utility to become cultural symbols of meaning and belonging. This research contributes to existing literature on brand management by providing actionable guidance for transforming ordinary brands into objects of consumer reverence and transgenerational loyalty.

Keywords: Brand communities, consumer tribes, brand storytelling, brand platforms, consumer rituals, brand management

Introduction

The fundamental communal nature of human beings has remained a cornerstone of social science inquiry, establishing that individuals possess inherent tendencies toward social connection and collective participation (Durkheim, 1912). Contemporary research continues to validate these early anthropological insights, demonstrating that human behaviour emerges from complex social contexts where relationships and interactions fundamentally shape individual choices and value systems (Granovetter, 1985; Simmel, 1950). This social embeddedness extends beyond basic survival needs to encompass emotional, psychological, and cultural dimensions that define human existence within society (Baumeister& Leary, 1995).

Within marketing contexts, this communal orientation significantly influences consumer behaviour patterns, challenging traditional economic models that portrayed consumers as purely rational utility maximizers (Schiffman & Kanuk, 2007). Recent scholarship emphasizes the social, emotional, and communal aspects of consumption, revealing how brands function as social symbols that facilitate relationship building, group identity expression, and cultural participation (Muniz & O’Guinn, 2001). Consumer culture theory has further illuminated the importance of social relationships in consumption processes, demonstrating how consumers utilize brands to foster emotional connections both with brand entities and within their social networks (Arnould & Thompson, 2005; Arnould & Price, 1993).

Contemporary brands face dual challenges of market differentiation within saturated environments and cultivation of sustainable consumer loyalty. Traditional demographic-based targeting approaches prove increasingly insufficient for establishing the depth of connection

necessary for enduring brand relationships. Brands achieving “sacred” status transcend conventional consumer-brand interactions by creating connections that integrate them into consumer identities and daily routines.

This paper proposes a conceptual framework for strengthening brand sacredness through four interrelated dimensions: tribe development, storytelling excellence, platform optimization, and ritual cultivation. By constructing communities based on shared beliefs and creating meaningful engagement rituals, brands can transcend functional value propositions to become symbols of personal and collective identity.

Methodology

This conceptual framework emerges from qualitative insights derived from longitudinal ethnographic research conducted within archetypal consumer communities, with particular emphasis on club culture environments. Over multiple years, participant observations, in-depth interviews, and content analysis of brand-community interactions were employed to understand the dynamics of community formation, narrative patterns, platform engagement behaviours, and ritualistic practices.

The ethnographic approach provided access to rich, contextual data regarding how consumers co-create meaning and identity through brand affiliations. These empirical insights were interpreted through established theoretical frameworks including Social Identity Theory, Narrative Transportation Theory, Social Exchange Theory, and Ritual Theory, which collectively inform the TSPR model development. While maintaining conceptual focus, the empirical foundation strengthens the model’s relevance and applicability within real-world branding contexts.

Literature Review

Marketing scholarship has undergone significant evolution over recent decades. Initial research in the 1970s primarily examined antecedents and outcomes of customer satisfaction, with brand management emerging as a distinct discipline during the late 1980s and 1990s, focusing on brand extension and brand equity concepts (Joshi & Yadav, 2016). The early 2000s witnessed increased attention to emotional dimensions of brand management, including brand love (Carroll & Ahuvia, 2006), brand attachment (Park et al., 2007; Park et al., 2008), brand trust (Delgado-Ballester & Munuera-Aleman, 2001; Ha, 2004), and brand resonance (Rindfleisch et al., 2006; Moore & Wurster, 2007).

Subsequent research has explored consumer-brand relationships with increasing sophistication, emphasizing emotional connections and incorporating psychological theories to understand consumer behaviour across diverse contexts (Sarkar & Sreejesh, 2014).

The transition from generic to branded product preferences necessitated deeper understanding of emotional responses, while digital platform proliferation enabled consumer engagement across multiple touchpoints (Grace et al., 2018). Contemporary consumers utilize brands for identity expression and social positioning, elevating brand managers’ strategic roles in communication and positioning to foster meaningful customer connections. Brands increasingly add value and meaning to products, with consumers seeking alignment between brand values and their cultural beliefs (Borzooei & Asgari, 2013).

Brand Sacredness and Consumer Attachment

Sacred consumption concepts within consumer research connect closely to emotional attachment and symbolic value frameworks. Belk, Wallendorf, and Sherry (1989) define sacred consumption as experiences characterized as “extraordinary, powerful, and emotionally charged.” This sacredness transforms consumer items from mere objects into symbols of identity and belonging. Brand sacredness involves cultivating reverence and emotional commitment that transcends functional value while enhancing brand loyalty (Albert et al., 2008). Pimenteland Reynolds (2004) describe how brands perceived as sacred achieve quasi-religious status, becoming integral to consumer lives through symbolic value and ritualistic practices.

The TSPR Conceptual Framework

The TSPR model operates through four interconnected pillars that synergistically cultivate strong and profitable brand relationships. Each component interacts dynamically with others to create comprehensive brand experiences that embed deeply within consumer consciousness and behaviour patterns.

Conceptual Framework.

 Tribe: Building Community Beyond Demographics

The Tribe component challenges traditional consumer segmentation approaches as insufficient for understanding variables that build genuine consumer connections. Conventional demographic-based segmentation captures limited aspects of contemporary consumers’ complex, values-driven motivations. Cova and Cova (2002) introduced tribal marketing concepts, shifting focus from transactional approaches and conventional segmentation toward ethnographic delineation of consumer communities, enabling brands to understand customers more comprehensively, including their values, motivations, beliefs, behaviours and other unique nuances,

Tribal concepts emerge from cultural and communal contexts focusing on bonds created through shared values, beliefs, and emotional connections (Canniford, 2011). When brands approach consumer segmentation and engagement from tribal perspectives, deeper connections and stronger brand affinity become achievable.

Treating consumers as tribal communities’ fosters belonging and loyalty, building stronger emotional bonds than approaches that treat consumers as demographic or geographic target audiences. Digital platform proliferation has accelerated tribal marketing concepts, enabling geographically dispersed individuals to connect around shared brand interests and ideologies. Harley-Davidson exemplifies this approach through focus on “freedom-seeking rebel” archetypes, fostering global communities bound by common values rather than demographic similarities (Schouten & McAlexander, 1995). This concept derives from Social Identity Theory, emphasizing how individuals derive self-concept from group affiliations (Tajfel & Turner, 1979).

Story: Creating Emotional Resonance Through Narrative

Storytelling has emerged as fundamental to brand building, serving as a powerful mechanism for creating emotional resonance and reinforcing brand values within consumer communities. Escalas (2004) demonstrates how storytelling enables brands to embed within consumers’ self-narratives, fostering identification and attachment. Stories resonating with consumer

aspirations and life experiences create meaning, shaping brand perception and loyalty (Woodside, Sood, & Miller, 2008).

Strategic storytelling transcends product or service promotion to create emotional connections, communicate brand values, and build memorable identities that resonate personally and culturally with customers. As markets become saturated and consumers more discerning, brands must differentiate through meaning, identity, and emotional resonance alongside functional attributes.

According to Fog et al. (2005), brand storytelling “creates coherence between the product and the consumer’s worldview,” facilitating emotional engagement. This transforms brands from transactional entities into relational and symbolic constructs (Escalas, 2004). Narrative Theory (Fisher, 1984) proposes that humans understand their world through stories, enabling brands to communicate messages aligning with consumers’ worldviews and identity structures. Holt (2004) argues that strong brands emerge through “cultural branding,” wherein brands tell stories resonating with ideological and cultural tensions.

The storytelling approach builds upon Narrative Transportation Theory (Green & Brock, 2000), which posits that individuals can become deeply immersed in stories, leading to psychological states where mental imagery, emotional engagement, and reduced counter-arguing influence attitudes and beliefs. When consumers experience “transportation” into narratives, their real-world concerns diminish, increasing receptivity to persuasive messages embedded within stories.

This theoretical foundation rests on three pillars: cognitive engagement through mental processing of story content, plot, character, and narrative; affective response through emotional experiences when storylines align with consumer beliefs, personality, and expectations; and mental imagery enabling consumers to visualize stories, creating strong narrative immersion.

Platform: Facilitating Community Interaction and Engagement

Brand platforms serve as foundational ecosystems where brand communities interact, share experiences, and strengthen bonds, ultimately reinforcing brand sacred status. Kapferer (2012) defines brand platforms as ecosystems of channels, touchpoints, and environments, both physical and virtual, where brands express themselves, interact with stakeholders, and deliver value propositions. Social Exchange Theory (Homans, 1958) strengthens platform concepts by propositing that individuals engage in social interactions based on reciprocal benefit expectations. This theory provides theoretical foundation for brand platform development, creating interactive opportunities for brand constituents to engage, collaborate, and fraternize while fostering reciprocity and mutual benefit, driving positive engagement and loyalty.

Successful brand platforms transcend message broadcasting to provide two-way communication, collaboration, and co-creation opportunities. Brands can leverage social listening tools to gain insights into preferences, opinions, and needs of community members, enabling tailored offerings and experiences. Brand platforms should offer value-added content and experiences enriching audience lives, whether through educational resources, entertaining content, or exclusive benefits, providing tangible value that reinforces reciprocity and strengthens brand loyalty.

Vargo and Lusch (2004) propose that value emerges through interaction co-creation. Platforms, particularly digital ones, enable real-time, participatory brand engagement, allowing users to become active co-creators of brand meaning. Pine and Gilmore (1999) argue that experiences are central to economic value creation. Physical and digital platforms enable branded experiences transcending transactions to create emotional and memorable connections.

Ritual: Establishing Practices That Elevate Brand Interaction

Rituals play crucial roles in fostering brand sacredness by transforming consumer interactions into meaningful, symbolic practices and repeatable experiences. Rook (1985) defines rituals as “symbolic activity, consisting of a sequence of behaviours that are repeated over time.” Within brand contexts, rituals help integrate brands into consumer routines and significant life events, reinforcing emotional connections and loyalty (Kozinets, 2002). Ritualizationdraws fromanthropologicaltheories such as VanGennep’s (1909) rites ofpassage, demonstrating how rituals mark transitions and reinforce social bonds. Brand rituals represent recurring behaviours or activities holding symbolic meaning and significance for communities, reinforcing connections to brands. Whether morning coffee from beloved cafés or weekly yoga sessions at preferred studios, rituals shape consumer behaviour and foster brand loyalty.

Cultivating brand rituals requires identifying and amplifying existing behaviours already associated with products or services. By elevating these rituals and making them integral to brand experiences, brands can deepen emotional resonance with communities. Brands can innovate and introduce new rituals aligning with their values and objectives, involving community events, limited-edition products, or social impact campaigns inspiring collective action and solidarity among community members.

The Ritual component underscores the importance of cultivating recurring behaviours and activities that imbue brand experiences with symbolic meaning and significance. Rituals serve as identity and belonging markers, reinforcing bonds between brands and community members. As Hertz (1960) posits, “Rituals are the social glue that binds individual behaviours into cohesive collective practices, fostering a sense of continuity and belonging.”

Brand Love: Building emotional bound with a brand

The convergence of Tribe, Story, Platform, and Ritual within the TSPR framework creates a powerful synergy that transforms ordinary brand interactions into profound emotional connections. When brands successfully integrate these four elements, they transcend traditional marketing boundaries to create what can be understood as brand love. Brand love acts as a significant determinant in shaping brand sacredness, brand fidelity and WOM, establishing it as a crucial bridge between consumer engagement and deeper brand reverence (Joshi & Rahman, 2021). This transformation occurs through the strategic orchestration of community belonging (Tribe), compelling narrative (Story), accessible touchpoints (Platform), and meaningful practices (Ritual) that collectively foster an emotional investment extending beyond functional benefits. The TSPR model recognizes that contemporary consumers seek experiences that resonate with their identity and values, creating opportunities for brands to position themselves as integral components of their customers’ personal narratives.

The Tribe component of the TSPR model establishes the foundational sense of belonging that customers crave in an increasingly fragmented digital landscape. When brands create authentic communities around shared values and experiences, they provide consumers with identity validation and social connection that goes beyond product utility. There is community. I see the same people every week, as Vincent (2018) observes about ritualistic brand experiences, highlighting how consistent community engagement creates familiarity and trust. This tribal connection becomes particularly powerful when combined with compelling brand stories that resonate with community members’ personal experiences and aspirations. The Story element serves as the emotional thread that weaves individual experiences into a collective narrative, allowing consumers to see themselves as protagonists in a larger brand saga. Together, Tribe and Story create the emotional foundation upon which deeper brand relationships are built, moving consumers from mere users to active participants in a brand’s ongoing narrative.

Platform serves as the critical infrastructure that enables and amplifies the impact of Tribe and Story within the TSPR framework. Modern platforms provide the technological backbone for community formation and story sharing, while also creating multiple touchpoints for brand interaction. Sensory and emotional online customer experiences significantly influenced brand love in the context of the customers (Safeer et al., 2022), demonstrating how digital platforms can create meaningful emotional connections when designed thoughtfully. The Platform component ensures that tribal connections and shared stories are accessible across various channels and formats, creating consistency in brand experience while allowing for personalization. This accessibility is crucial for maintaining the continuity of emotional engagement that characterizes brand love.

When platforms facilitate genuine interaction and value exchange rather than one-way communication, they become spaces where brand love can flourish through repeated positive experiences and community reinforcement. Ritual represents the behavioural manifestation of brand love within the TSPR model, transforming routine interactions into meaningful practices that reinforce emotional bonds. By understanding the difference between a habit and a ritual, we can begin to infuse our daily actions with a sense of wonder and purpose (Zen Habits, 2024). When brands create ritualistic experiences around their products or services, they elevate ordinary consumption into acts of personal significance and community participation. These rituals might include specific usage patterns, community gatherings, or symbolic practices that reinforce brand values and tribal identity. The power of ritual lies in its ability to create predictable moments of positive emotion and meaning, which over time develop into deep psychological attachments. Through consistent ritualistic engagement, consumers develop what might be termed brand devotion, where brand interaction becomes intertwined with personal identity and social belonging.

The culmination of effective TSPR implementation is the emergence of brand sacredness, a state where brands transcend their commercial origins to become objects of reverence and deep emotional significance. Brand love acts as a significant determinant in shaping brand sacredness, brand fidelity and WOM (Joshi & Rahman, 2019), establishing the pathway from emotional connection to sacred status. When the four elements of TSPR work in harmony, they create conditions where consumers begin to view brands as integral to their identity, values, and social connections. This sacredness manifests in protective behaviours toward the brand, evangelical advocacy, and resistance to competitive alternatives that characterize the strongest brand relationships. The sacred brand becomes a symbol of personal and community identity, protected and celebrated by its tribal members through ongoing stories, platform engagement, and ritual practices. This transformation from brand love to brand sacredness represents the ultimate achievement of the TSPR model, creating sustainable competitive advantages that extend far beyond traditional marketing metrics.

 Discussion and Implications

The TSPR framework presents a comprehensive approach to brand sacredness development through systematic integration of community building, narrative excellence, platform optimization, and ritual cultivation. Each component reinforces others within a synergistic system that elevates brands beyond functional utility toward cultural significance and emotional reverence. Contemporary marketing environments increasingly demand sophisticated approaches acknowledging the social and emotional dimensions of consumption. The TSPR model addresses these demands by providing actionable guidance for brands seeking to transcend traditional marketing limitations and achieve sacred status within consumer consciousness Practical implementation of the TSPR framework requires systematic progression through distinct phases, each building upon the previous stage to create sustainable brand sacredness. The TSPR framework adapts this cyclical model into a five-phase sequential implementation process specifically designed for achieving brand sacredness.

Phase 1: Foundation Analysis and Community Discovery

The initial phase focuses on comprehensive context analysis to understand the environmental, organizational, and consumer dimensions that will influence brand sacredness development. This foundation phase incorporates analyzing the market, industry, competitors, and stakeholders, as well as opportunities and threats in society while simultaneously conducting deep community research to identify potential sacred spaces and existing ritualized behaviours. Organizations must invest significant resources in ethnographic research during this phase, moving beyond traditional demographic analysis toward understanding community values, aspirations, and existing meaning-making practices. This research informs subsequent phases by identifying opportunities for authentic community engagement and potential resistance to brand integration within sacred consumer spaces. The foundation phase also requires thorough organizational assessment to determine capacity for sustained community engagement and authentic narrative development. A brand promise should be grounded in the organization’s capabilities, ensuring it can always be delivered, making this internal analysis critical for successful TSPR implementation.

 Phase 2: Community Building and Relationship Establishment

Following foundation analysis, Brands begin systematic community building through authentic relationship establishment rather than audience targeting. This phase emphasizes creating spaces where potential community members can connect around shared values and experiences, laying the groundwork for eventual brand integration into meaningful consumer rituals. Community building during this phase requires patience and authenticity, as rushing toward commercial objectives can undermine the trust necessary for sacred brand status. Brands must demonstrate genuine commitment to community welfare, positioning themselves as facilitators of community connection rather than extractive commercial entities. The community building phase establishes the relational foundation upon which subsequent narrative development and platform optimization depend. Success during this phase is measured through engagement quality rather than quantity, focusing on depth of connection and community member retention rates.

Phase 3: Narrative Development and Story Integration

With established community relationships, brands can begin developing authentic narratives that resonate with community values and aspirations. This phase involves collaborative story creation where community members contribute to narrative development, ensuring authenticity and relevance. Narrative development within the TSPR framework goes beyond traditional brand storytelling to create meaning systems that community members can adopt and adapt for personal identity construction. These narratives must be flexible enough to accommodate diverse community interpretations while maintaining coherent brand essence. The story integration process requires careful attention to community feedback and iterative refinement based on community response. Brands must remain open to narrative evolution as community needs and values develop over time.

Phase 4: Platform Optimization and Sacred Space Creation

The fourth phase involves creating and optimizing platforms that facilitate meaningful community interaction and ritual performance. These platforms serve as sacred spaces where community members can engage in shared experiences that reinforce both individual identity and collective belonging. Platform optimization requires understanding how digital and physical spaces can work together to create cohesive community experiences. The platforms must support both individual expression and collective ritual, providing frameworks for meaningful engagement while allowing for personal customization. This phase emphasizes functionality and user experience optimization to ensure platforms support rather than hinder community interaction. One big consideration at this stage is the identification of tribes’ passion point to build a strong connection that combines functional, emotional and spiritual dimensions to create authentic connection.

 Phase 5: Ritual Cultivation and Practice Development

The fifth phase focuses on developing and implementing rituals that become integral to community member identity and routine. These rituals emerge from understanding community values and existing practices, creating structured experiences that enhance rather than replace meaningful behaviours. Ritual cultivation requires careful attention to psychological mechanisms through which repeated behaviours create emotional attachment and meaning.  Brands must design rituals that feel authentic and voluntary rather than imposed, allowing community members to discover and personalize ritual practices. The ritual development process involves extensive testing and refinement based on community participation patterns and feedback. Successful rituals become self-sustaining community

Limitations and Future Research

This conceptual framework, while grounded in ethnographic research, requires empirical validation across diverse industries and cultural contexts. Future research should examine the relative importance of each TSPR component across different product categories and consumer segments. Longitudinal studies tracking brand sacredness development over time would provide valuable insights into the dynamic relationships between framework components. Additionally, research investigating the role of digital transformation in TSPR implementation would enhance understanding of how technological advancement affects community building, storytelling, platform engagement, and ritual practices within contemporary marketing environments.

Conclusion

In increasingly fragmented and competitive marketplaces, brands must transcend functionality to achieve sacred status, becoming revered, emotionally resonant, and culturally embedded entities. This conceptual paper demonstrates how strategic integration of community cultivation, compelling narrative crafting, platform leveraging, and meaningful ritual creation can collectively elevate brands to sacredness. When consumers perceive brands as sacred, they engage beyond product or service transactions to embrace belief systems, identity sources, belonging, and transcendence.

Through fostering deep emotional connections via community loyalty, immersive storytelling, seamless platform experiences, and symbolic rituals, brands can inspire devotion comparable to religious or cultural reverence. The TSPR framework provides a roadmap for marketers seeking to transform ordinary brands into iconic, timeless symbols of meaning. Sacred brands emerge through consistent, intentional acts of community building, narrative depth, experiential richness, and ritual significance rather than overnight transformation.

 References

 Albert, N., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florence, P. (2008). When consumers love their brands: Exploring the concept and its dimensions. Journal of Business Research, 61(10), 1062-1075.

Arnould, E. J., & Price, L. L. (1993). River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 24-45.

Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868-882.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.

Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry, J. F., Jr. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behaviour: Theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 1-38.

Borzooei, M., & Asgari, M. (2013). The halal brand personality and its effect on purchase intention. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(3), 481-491.

Canniford, R. (2011). How to manage consumer tribes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19(7), 591-606.

Carroll, B. A., & Ahuvia, A. C. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, 17(2), 79-89.

Cova, B., & Cova, V. (2002). Tribal marketing: The tribalisation of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 595-620.

Delgado-Ballester, E., & Munuera-Alemán, J. L. (2001). Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12), 1238-1258.

Durkheim, E. (1912). The elementary forms of religious life. Free Press.

Escalas, J. E. (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 168-180.

Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51(1), 1-22.

Fog, K., Budtz, C., & Yakaboylu, B. (2005). Storytelling: Branding in practice. Springer.

Godin, S. (2008). Tribes: We need you to lead us. Portfolio.

Grace, D., Ross, M., & King, C. (2018). Brand fandom: A boundaryless study of sport team brand fandom. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 27(3), 234-248.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.

Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701-721.

Ha, H. Y. (2004). Factors influencing consumer perceptions of brand trust online. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(5), 329-342.

Hertz, R. (1960). Death and the right hand. Free Press.

Holt, D. B. (2004). How brands become icons: The principles of cultural branding. Harvard Business School Press.

Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behaviour as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.

Joshi, Y., & Yadav, M. S. (2016). Brand management: Past, present and future. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(1), 642-645.

Kapferer, J. N. (2012). The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking (5th ed.). Kogan Page.

Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-72.

Moore, K., & Wurster, T. (2007). Blown to bits: How the new economics of information transforms strategy. Harvard Business School Press.

Muniz, A. M., Jr., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412-432.

Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., & Priester, J. (2008). Brand attachment: Constructs, consequences, and causes. Foundations and Trends in Marketing, 1(3), 191-230.

Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010).

Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 1-17.

Pimentel, R. W., & Reynolds, K. E. (2004). A model for consumer devotion: Affective commitment with proactive sustaining behaviours. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 5, 1-45.

Pine, B. J., II, & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre and every business a stage. Harvard Business School Press.

Rindfleisch, A., Burroughs, J. E., & Denton, F. (1997). Family structure, materialism, and compulsive consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 312-325.

Rook, D. W. (1985). The ritual dimension of consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 251-264.

Sarkar, A., & Sreejesh, S. (2014). Examination of the roles played by brand love and jealousy in shaping customer engagement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(1), 24-32.

Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2007). Consumer behaviour (9th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Schouten, J. W., & McAlexander, J. H. (1995). Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 43-61.

Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel (K. H. Wolff, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1908)

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.

The Branding Journal. (2024). Brand management process: A comprehensive guide. https://www.thebrandingjournal.com

Van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage (M. B. Vizedom & G. L. Caffee, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1909)

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.

Woodside, A. G., Sood, S., & Miller, K. E. (2008). When consumers and brands talk: Storytelling theory and research in psychology and marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 97-145.