In a recent case, a Lagos State High Court located at Tafawa Balewa Square granted twenty-five thousand dollars in damages to Femi Falana, Senior Advocate of Nigeria and human rights lawyer, against Meta Platforms Inc. The decision was made in response to the release of a fabricated video on Facebook that purported to depict his terminal illness.

The decision matters beyond one individual.

In its ruling, the court held Meta accountable for the processing and dissemination of personal data that was both inaccurate and detrimental. Special protection is afforded to health information under Nigerian law. This safeguard remains intact regardless of an individual’s public status. The Nigerian Data Protection Act was invoked in the judgment, which assigned accountability to the platform where the content was published.

This case speaks directly to you as a brand leader, platform operator, or communications professional.

Digital platforms frequently identify themselves as impartial hosts. This assertion was denied by the court. Meta generates revenue through content distribution. Responsibility is generated by profit. Distance is no longer valid once content compromises privacy or reputation.

The damages amount looks modest. The signal carries weight.

Nigerian courts are increasingly scrutinising platform conduct. Misuse of personal data is no longer a murky issue. On social media, false narratives are disseminated rapidly. Liability ensues when platforms neglect to initiate action.

For brands, the lesson stays clear.

You operate within ecosystems that are regulated by technology companies. The platforms you utilise for publication are not your own. Your newsroom or agency workstation is not the end of the risk. Trust is rapidly eroded by association with deceptive or detrimental content.

Strong brand teams tighten the review processes. They enquire about the placement. They supervise the context. They respond promptly when content becomes misleading. Exposure is enhanced by silence.

For platforms, the warning grows louder.

Automated systems expand reach. They also escalate the severity of the injury. Particularly in the context of sensitive personal claims, human review is crucial. Damage is exacerbated by delay.

This decision advances the discourse in Nigeria. The enforcement of privacy law is now more robust. There is an increasing expectation from the public and the courts for platforms that operate locally.

You should anticipate increased scrutiny.

Neglect is no longer justifiable due to digital reach. Trust is predicated on judgment.

ALSO WATCH MARKETING EDGE ONTV