So, we’ve all been there, correct? You casually mention needing new running shoes, and your entire internet world becomes a Nike convention. While the obvious reason is your vast history of sneaker-related searches and that one time you stayed on a running shoe website for three minutes, a small voice in the back of your brain murmurs something more… knowing.

This is when the ethical tightrope walk starts. On the one hand, you have the overwhelming advertisements. Targeted advertisements, in their optimum form, are digital butlers, subtly providing just what you didn’t realize you sorely needed.

But again, the shadow of “creepy” looms large and disturbing. When those customized adverts appear overly predictive, as if they’ve been spying on your neurons, sparking a desire, or worse, acquired facts from a hushed phone call, the convenience dissipates like morning mist. It sheds light on a key tension: where does hyper-personalization transcend the invisible line into flagrant privacy violation?

Are our cherished pocket devices mute informants, meticulously translating our wants into data points for the hungry algorithms? The tech behemoths make soothing statements about advanced monitoring of our digital exhaust, the trails of clicks, likes, and shares that we leave throughout the internet. However, the nagging notion continues.

Read also: The call that went unanswered: how marketing missteps and brand evolution left Skype behind

Our inner conspiracy theorist puts on their tinfoil hat (mostly for comedic purposes). Forget Bigfoot; the true mystery is the hidden life of our cell phones. Are they merely processing data, or are they winking at the advertising business every time we express a purchase intention?

In a world where our online and offline lives are Siamese twins, the boundaries of what’s private feel increasingly blurred. The theories, whispered in the digital dark corners of the internet, range from the semi-plausible (advanced natural language processing of our text-based chats, though the implications are still shiver-inducing) to the delightfully absurd (“My smartwatch definitely has a direct line!”). We laugh, but the underlying anxiety is real.

Is it just astonishingly intelligent code doing its elaborate dance, or is there a naughty digital sprite tucked in our gadgets that has an extraordinary ability to know what we want before we even realize it? The explanation is most likely found in the sophisticated realm of algorithms, but the visceral experience of being targeted after a seemingly private time is powerful, highlighting our common uneasiness with the invisible forces molding our digital reality.

Watch also: Yanga FM’s niche is in creating a wholesome pidgin experience for today’s urban listeners.